Our office:
1495 Canyon Blvd
Suite 107
Boulder, CO 80302
info@centro.rocks
Need to Replace Troops? Start 👉 Here 👈
Compare
Every Salesforce and Teams integration is either built or bought.
Building means Power Automate flows, a MuleSoft project, or an iPaaS subscription, each with its own licensing and its own owner. Buying means a product like Centro that a Salesforce admin configures in Flow. This page lays out what each path costs to stand up, what it costs to keep running, and where the data goes.
What you build: one automated cloud flow per use case. Salesforce connector as the trigger, a condition step, a Teams action. Write-back from Teams needs a form or adaptive card plus a second flow to handle the response.
What it costs to run: the Salesforce connector is Premium, so each flow needs a Power Automate Premium per-user license or a Process per-flow license. Every action counts as a Power Platform request, including failures and retries, against a daily allocation per license.
Who owns it: your Microsoft admin. Flows run as the integration user, so Salesforce field-level security is the integration user's, not the reader's.
Where it fits: a handful of one-way notifications in a Microsoft-first shop that already holds Premium licenses.
Runs in: Microsoft 365 cloud flows
Owned by: Microsoft admin
Pricing model: Premium per-user or per-flow license
Limits: One flow per use case, requests metered per license
What you build: an API integration between Salesforce and Microsoft Graph, with custom UI for anything a user touches in Teams. Channel management, prompts, and write-back are all code.
What it costs to run: MuleSoft licensing is priced and scoped for an enterprise integration team, and the build carries its own maintenance. For a Teams integration on its own, that is hard to justify unless MuleSoft is already paid for and staffed.
Who owns it: developers.
Where it fits: institutions that already run MuleSoft for core systems and want Teams as one more endpoint on the same platform.
Runs in: Your MuleSoft runtime
Owned by: Developers
Pricing model: Enterprise licensing plus build maintenance
Limits: Custom code for UI, channels, and write-back
What you build: a Zap or a recipe per use case, with Salesforce and Teams connectors. Write-back needs a form and a return flow.
What it costs to run: metered per task or per run. Every flow passes through the vendor's infrastructure, which is a data-path question for any firm with a governance review.
Who owns it: ops or IT.
Where it fits: small companies with a few one-way notifications and no governance constraint on a third-party runtime.
Runs in: Vendor runtime
Owned by: Ops or IT
Pricing model: Metered per task or run
Limits: No channels tied to records, data passes through vendor
What you configure: Centro's actions inside Salesforce Flow. Create a channel from a record, add members, post a message, prompt a user, write the answer back. Any object, standard or custom. No Apex, no Block Kit, no Power Automate.
What it costs to run: a flat per-user subscription with no message or request metering. See /pricing.
Who owns it: your Salesforce admin.
Where the data goes: through the Salesforce API, with no shadow data store. Every write lands under the user's own login with field history intact. Non-licensed teammates are reached through the automation user. SOC 2 Type II. See /security.
Where it fits: any team with more than a couple of use cases, channels tied to records, two-way updates, or people outside Salesforce who need to be in the loop.
| Criterion | Power Automate | MuleSoft | Zapier / Workato | Centro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit of work | One flow per use case | One integration project | One Zap or recipe per use case | One Flow action per step |
| Write back from Teams | Form plus a second flow | Custom UI and code | Form plus a return flow | Built in: prompts and forms |
| Channels tied to records | Custom flow | Custom code | No | Yes, full lifecycle |
| Non-licensed teammates | Read only via the flow user | Custom | Via the connector user | Yes, via the automation user |
| Who owns it | Microsoft admin | Developers | Ops or IT | Salesforce admin |
| Data path | Microsoft 365 | Your MuleSoft runtime | Vendor runtime | Salesforce API, no shadow data store |
| Audit trail on writes | Integration user | Custom | Connector user | Per user, field history intact |
| Metering | Requests per day per license | API volume | Per task or run | None, flat per user |
If you have one notification to send and a Premium license already, build the flow. If you have a MuleSoft team and Teams is one endpoint among many, let them build it. For everything else, the cost of building is the cost of owning it, and that is what Centro removes. Setup steps for Power Automate and Centro are on the how-to page. See every comparison on one page. Book a demo.
Yes. The native Salesforce app is configuration only, Power Automate is a visual flow builder, and Centro automations are built in Salesforce Flow. Only the last two automate anything, and only Centro does it without a flow per use case.
The one where Salesforce data does not get copied. Look for an integration that reads and writes through the Salesforce API, writes under the user's own login, and has no separate data store. Ask any vendor for their data flow diagram and subprocessor list.
It depends on the method. Power Automate keeps data inside Microsoft 365 but runs as an integration user. iPaaS tools route data through their runtime. Centro reads and writes through the Salesforce API with no shadow data store, documented at /security.
A single notification flow takes an afternoon. A set of flows with write-back, error handling, and channel management is an ongoing project, and each flow is licensed and maintained on its own.
Yes. Centro's actions run inside Salesforce Flow. If your admin can build a Flow, they can build the integration.
A 30-minute walkthrough of what you have, what you need, and which method fits.